• elections
• shutdown
• Trump
• 10th Amendment
• Citizenship

Serious question: Has Ashton Kutcher come out with a new ‘Punked’ show aimed at Conservative Voters that I haven’t heard of? Does Lucy Van Pelt now intern for Ronna McDaniel?  

Controlled opposition shills such as Ben Shapiro tell us we need better candidates to win elections.  Our so-called ‘elected’ officials tell us to ‘vote harder’ next time. This is naïve at best and absolute gaslighting at worst.  They are asking Conservatives to essentially “bring a vote to a cheat fight.” I will no longer participate in good faith in a contest where cheating is occurring. You know and I know that Sloth did not beat out Dr. Oz for the US Senate in Pennsylvania (on what planet did you think that sentence would ever be spoken?). 

Oh, And Spare Us Your ‘Analysis’ 

When I see talking heads and other propagandists talking at us, their so-called ‘analysis’ tries to explain to us plebes “what went wrong.” But it is the framing of their questions that reveals the lie. They ask, “Why didn’t Republicans perform as expected?”  But this implies that the failure was somehow our fault (e.g. bad candidates or not voting hard enough).  

Here’s what you’ll never hear: “How in the hell did Democrats win with enthusiasm on the Right rivaled only by the Left’s rank criminality?” or “How is it possible that candidates who couldn’t fill a high school gym won so overwhelmingly…again?” This is the tell, patriot. They cheated, they KNOW they cheated, and this is why they frame their rhetoric the way they do. 

Give us your over-taxed, over-regulated, your deplorables yearning to breathe free. 

Here’s what we know: It simply does not matter how many voters participate when your enemy counts the votes.  ‘Voting harder’ is not a strategy to win a fixed game. ‘Better candidates’ don’t win elections (just ask Dr. Oz how that worked in his rigged contest against Sloth).  

One solution by Governor DeSantis was the implementation of a variety of election integrity measures which appears to have had great success. This, combined with refugees from California and New York, culminated in a successful election. How many accusations of cheating have you seen coming out of Florida as compared to Arizona? 

Others such as Gab CEO, Andrew Torba, agree with my own thinking that we must create a parallel everything to combat the rigged system. It is the ultimate nullification. Who cares if Alameda, Portland or Chicago try to shutter your business when you are mobbed by Patriots throwing money at you when you ask for help? BreathEasy calls this a “BUYCOTT.” Talk about “power to the people…” 

But isn’t there a third choice? If the Communists insist on cheating, their cheating removes any requirement for us to abide by the rules of the contest also. Their cheating has given us permission to join them in the cheat. And it is this choice that goes completely uncommented upon by ANY on the Right. If we truly want to wrest control from our rulers, shouldn’t we turn our elections into a ‘may the best cheater win’ scenario and beat them at their own game? 

How to Create A Level Playing Field – The Lance Armstrong Stratagem 

In an interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2013, Lance Armstrong admitted to doping to win the Tour de France seven times. While his admission sent the world into a tizzy of scandal and comeuppance, Armstrong made two interesting statements that were completely uncommented upon by anyone.   

Let’s see if you see now what I saw then: 

“…Winfrey asked Armstrong whether his actions felt wrong, or whether he felt bad or whether they even felt like cheating. His answer to each of those questions: "No." 

"I viewed it as a level playing field," he said. 

And this gem: 

“…He also said he didn't believe that it was possible to win seven titles without using drugs "in that culture."” 

Do you see it?  

Lance implied that he was not the only athlete cheating. He asserted that in order to have a chance of winning at all, doping was absolutely required.  It was the “culture” of the Tour de France that required doping in order to be competitive at all. All poor Lance did was accept the premise. 

Therefore, if we apply Armstrong’s choice to the criminally compromised elections of the American Empire, there is an argument that says, if you want to win a contest where your adversary cheats, you must join the criminals in their criminality. This, at least, would ‘level the playing field’ and turn the contest into a ‘may the best cheater win’ scenario. This solution states that we MUST cheat if we are to continue to play the game. 

Many of my brethren on the Right will (and should) instinctively wince at such a suggestion. They would rightfully say, “cheating will make us no better than criminals” and “two wrongs don’t make a right.”  

My cynical follow up to this would be: Sure, but how bad do you want to win? 

Let’s look at why Lance made the choice he made.  Lance claimed he doped because of his 

"… ruthless desire to win"  

Would we say that conservatives have a ‘ruthless desire to win?’ I think it’s obvious we have a STRONG desire to win, sure. You might even say we have a RIGHTEOUS desire to win.  But we most definitely do not have a RUTHLESS desire to win.  

However, the Communists unfortunately do. You and I both know that stripped of their power and influence, our enemies would find it mighty hard to get their (our!) chauffeured limos and private jets if they didn’t feel entitled to leverage any and every tool at their disposal to keep the shrimp cocktail flowing. It’s not like that Gender Studies degree from Vasser qualifies them for anything other than flipping burgers and organizing riots. 

But here is where we find the flaw in Lance’s self-justification. His desire to ‘win’ at any cost (which included his honor) was what forced him to compromise his values. Looking from the outside in, the more honor-preserving choice for Lance might have been to simply not participate in a compromised contest.  

So am I in favor of cheating harder than our Communist enemies? No. Above all else, we must maintain our honor and our right to hold our head up high. Our wins must be airtight. However, I am certainly NOT in favor of holding our head up high enough for it to be lopped off by the mob during our own American Reign of Terror that is most assuredly likely with this crop of latter day Robespierres. 

But in a contest that is irreparably corrupted, there is no valid argument to continue to compete. 

Our solution lies in pouring gas on what Governor DeSantis has recently merely toyed with. The 10th Amendment is, by a mile, the strongest of the Amendments contained within the American Constitution. It is also the small exhaust port on the Empire’s Election Fraud Space Station. Dare I say it is the BreathEasy solution implemented at the State level? 

For those newcomers to Constitutional thinking, the 10th Amendment states quite simply: 

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” 

We have seen that criminals absolutely rely on the centralization of power within the Executive Branch to maintain their cheat. The 10th Amendment is the Patriot Governors’ tool to nullify federal criminality, illegal mandates or other usurpations and insults to a Free People.  

Yes, they will rage and they will whine. They will call it a Constitutional Crisis and defend their central authoritarianism even if it means ruling over ashes afterwards. They will also demonstrate their belief that ‘might makes right.’  

But the Free States of America will summarily ignore all of it.  Every State in this Union of American States is a sovereign nation unto itself. We must relearn the notion of American ‘dual sovereignty.’ Our solution is not held in one election or a single savior individual. Our solution is generational and will take time until their criminality crumbles into a heap and nothing is left of it except for a footnote in a far-future history book and the echoes of long dead harpies. 

We have our solution; in fact, we always did. We know that the Communists cannot and will not allow a fair election. It is time to leverage the 10th Amendment to its fullest expression and declare in one voice that we are not mere subdivisions of a federal empire. We are States, sovereign nations in our own right. 

And when these newly minted ‘leaders’ attempt to exercise stolen authority, it will be met with a deafening indifference as we live our lives within our State borders and watch as our crops and our children take root and grow to feed our future, rooted in republican government, a Constitutional Rule of Law and a cherishing of Individual Liberty. 

Sincerely,

Share this post

Attention Business Owners!

Do you want to reach the Patriots who are already seeking out businesses who share their values? Are you concerned that future lockdowns and illegal mandates will force you to close your life's work?

BreathEasy is the answer to the elite's hubris. Join the BreathEasy network today and together we will ignore their illegal mandates with the strength that only an unbreakable bond between customer and business built by shared values can create.

Sign up and become a BreathEasy Business today

Share this post

Friends,

Last week, I ran across an article by some talking head/propagandist who told us that Latin Americans, by their very nature, are racists. Yup! I couldn’t believe it either. It came about when they attempted to cover for the LA City Council’s recent (secretly recorded) racist remarks by attributing their racism to “latinidad.” 

In case you hadn’t yet heard on your local Big Brother Outlet, several LA City Council members have resigned when their objectively racist remarks during an official meeting with Labor were secretly recorded (likely) by the very people they were meeting and then leaked online. 

Now, for my readers who do not speak Spanish, “latinidad” basically translates to “Latin-ocity” or “Latin-itude.” “Latinidad,” just like it’s English approximations, sounds just as invented in Spanish as it does in English. It’s a made-up word that roughly translates to ‘all things Latino.’ 

In the article that I ran across the other day (and I DO apologize that I can’t find it again), the writer was trying to downplay the abject racism that these elected officials displayed while conducting official business by attributing their racism to “Latinidad.” In other words, this propagandist tried to play off racism by his tribe by saying, “that’s just Latinos being Latinos.”  Next thing we’re going to hear is, “Puerto Ricans are ‘passionate.’”

So, if you’re following along, this guy just painted an entire hemisphere as unreconstructed, uncivilized racists who are incapable of functioning in a modern society without letting their inner bigot-flag fly. If there were a broader brush with which to paint a people, I can’t imagine it.  The giant irony here is that this ‘pundit’ exposed and confirmed his own “unconscious bias” when he demonstrated that racist birds DO flock together. 

So, taking this crypto-racist seriously, why not take his idiotic statement and run with it? Stop ignoring their obvious spin and force them to embrace it and everything it implies.  By his own statement, he claims every Latino is racist. And because this is a de facto disqualifier for participation in civilized society, did he just inadvertently disqualify every Latino from ever holding public office ever again?

His statement about latinidad was a throwaway statement never meant to be taken seriously or remembered; he had to say something to protect his tribe.  But instead of letting his statement drift away and be forgotten like so much smoke in a mild breeze, we should start holding these zealots accountable for their statements and force them to LIVE their spin.

Here’s what I mean:

During the next selection election in Los Angeles, why not ask the Democrat Latino candidate, “it’s been said that all Latinos are racist. How will you overcome your racism and represent ALL Angelenos?”  When they huff and puff and refuse to ‘dignify your question with a response,’ remind them of the LA City Council’s episode of official, casual racism now on display. Force them to confront the hypocrisy of their tribe and ball them up in knots as they try to extricate themselves. Don’t forget to laugh at them, the comedy writes itself.

And in case you thought democrats’ racism was limited to just Los Angeles elected officials, let me remind you of a speech in 2001 where Justice Soto-Mayor said,

“…Justice O'Connor has often been cited as saying that a wise old man and wise old woman will reach the same conclusion in deciding cases…I am also not so sure that I agree with the statement…”

“…I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life [emphasis mine].”

Notice that where former Justice O’Connor explicitly stated the equal capability of both men and women, Soto-Mayor disagreed with the premise!  Instead, she inserted race into a non-racial discussion and said that “Latinos” are inherently ‘better.’  Not only did she explicitly claim that a Latino woman, by virtue of her race, would render a better judgment, but she is apparently casting herself in the role of this ‘wise Latina.’

My God, the hubris. Is it any wonder these people thought they could mandate that the entire world to wear a worthless surgical mask slave muzzle at their local Piggly Wiggly? This is how these people think.

So, how do we make Soto-Mayor live and defend her own stupid claim?

Soto – Mayor should be publicly and loudly asked this question at every possible occasion: “How can you judge ANY case or pretend to be impartial if you are a known racist?”

Or here’s another one, “Can you point to any decisions where your ‘latinidad’ produced a better decision than your white or male counterparts?”

Don’t forget: these aren’t our definitions; these aren’t our rules. These are the definitions that our enemies have offered themselves. We must force them to defend their hypocrisy. And as you’ve seen in recent years, they twist themselves into Gordian Knots defending the indefensible, and it’s hilarious!

Here’s another case illustrative of the larger point:

During her confirmation hearing for SCOTUS earlier this year, Katanji-Brown was asked and couldn’t answer what a woman was. In spite of the fact that she, herself, was equipped with the requisite equipment indicative of the gender, she was still unable to define herself.  She answered by saying that she “wasn’t a biologist.”

Who knew?! Who knew that one needed a bachelor’s degree in the natural sciences to figure out which clothing department at Target to buy its clothes (you know she ain’t no Walmart grrrl)!

Now you and I both know that her stupid answer was nothing more than a dodge to avoid the wrath of the Alphabet People.  But to this I say, “fine! Good!” We now have a SCOTUS justice who testified that she is so ignorant of…of….geeze, I can’t even describe how BASIC the information is that she claims ignorance of.  Katanji-Brown claims ignorance of something so basic that 3-year-olds have figured it out. 

To be honest, I think the confirmation committee really missed an opportunity here to force her to live her non-truth.  Some great follow up questions could have been,

“OK, I understand that you would like to avoid answering questions so broad and expansive that you risk offending someone; that is very polite of you.  So, let me ask you: Are YOU a woman? Are there any justices on the Court now that you suspect of being a woman?”

The irony here is that we, again, have their own words to declare their stupidity and obtuseness. We aren’t ascribing or speculating at all. Our future dismissal of literally any opinion she renders will be answered with, “yeah, but can she tell me what a woman is?” as we laugh at her.

Again, to this I say, “fine!”  Why? Because she has absolutely disqualified herself from rendering ANY opinion at all, ever, inside the courtroom or out, that has even the slightest sexual component. 

These justices give interviews, so why don’t we take it upon ourselves to make sure we make it through the call screener with the Communist-friendly (and obviously falsely premised) question, “You are so brave! What’s it like to be the first POC on the court?” and then, when you make it on the air, you instead ask, “I loved how you handled your confirmation hearings! But how do you know you’re not a man?”

These people not only should be mocked, but they should be mocked mercilessly, publicly and at every opportunity. These animals and anti-civilization zealots absolutely seek the limelight and adoration of their tribe. We should infiltrate that tribe (you know, like the K-FBI-GB infiltrates domestic terrorist groups that they themselves create) and cause absolute havoc.  The bonus here is that because every value they have, every special sub-group that exists for them (infinitely sub-divided to create specialness out of people who are uniquely not special at all), when they attempt to use logical gymnastics to defend the indefensible, they will invariably insult or sleight some other sub-group. This is how internecine warfare is fostered; blow on that smoldering ember.

We are at war and going on the offense is NEVER a bad idea. No army has ever won a war playing defense. These people are absolutely ripe for mockery and ego deflation. Let’s help that along, shall we?

BreathEasy is the free app that helps patriots create the patriot economy. Users vote on businesses on how well (or how poorly!) a business respects its customers Rights and Liberties.  We are building the Patriot Economy One BreathEasy vote at a time. Won't you join us?

Go to breathez.org to learn more!

Share this post